Beyond human: How I became a cyborg
When writer Frank Swain joined the ranks of the
cyborgs, he discovered that it meant losing control of a part of his body.
He explores why enhancing the senses raises surprising
personal and ethical problems.
Last
year I became a cyborg. At the time it didn’t seem like an auspicious occasion,
more a humbling and disorientating experience. But I’ve become excited about
being part-robot.
My
journey began when my hearing started to falter, due to a combination of
unlucky genetics and too many late nights in loud clubs. By the time I was 30,
I was losing scraps of conversation in crowded bars, and trips to the movies
were nothing but booms and rumbles. Eventually, I relented and booked an
appointment with an audiologist, who recommended I be fitted with hearing aids.
With
that decision, I joined the millions of people whose mind, body or senses are
replaced by technology, from wireless pacemakers to bionic legs. We live in the age of
augmentation, and soon we may all choose
to be enhanced in some way. After all, many prosthetic
technologies do more than just fill in for our body or mind when it falls short
– they now offer the potential to become “better than human”.
When I
was fitted with hearing aids, I wondered: could I hack them to give me enhanced
listening abilities? I explored this question in a BBC radio documentary this week, and discovered that the
answer is far from simple. It turns out I don’t actually own my new ears in the
way that I thought – and this raises important questions about many other
augmenting technologies on the horizon, from retinal implants to bionic arms.
Unlike
glasses, which simply focus the world through a lens, hearing aids take a very
active role as an augment. They monitor the environment with their tiny
microphones, constantly adjusting their output based on what they think is
useful sound rather than noise. What I hear is their interpretation of the
world around me.
This
means these augments offer a very exciting possibility, because I don’t have to
settle for hearing that is as good as an ordinary person. I could configure my
own devices to extend my senses beyond normal abilities. I wouldn’t be first to
hope for such a thing either: artist Neil Harbisson, for example, has built devices that let him hear what
colour sounds like.
In my case, connecting my hearing aids to an internet-linked tool such as a
smartphone, any conceivable information can be streamed directly to my hearing
aids. Unlike your eyes, which can only focus on a single object, your ears are
purpose-built to absorb huge amounts of complex information at once.
Ethical
issues are to be raised as these technologies become more common. For example: my ears could be aware of
the entire world, everything from approaching bad weather to levels of internet
traffic around me. With the right app, instead of being hard of hearing, I
could be superhuman.
No
tinkering
Unfortunately,
supercharging my hearing aids is not just challenging, it’s positively forbidden.
During one fitting, I asked the technician calibrating them how I could adjust
the settings myself, in case I found them too loud or too quiet for a
particular environment. “You can’t do that!” he exclaimed with some alarm.
“It’s very important they are only set up by a qualified audiologist.”
He
needn’t have worried too much. Hearing aids are, by design, incredibly
resistant to tinkering. Some have a button to switch between modes for
different environments. Others – like my current pair – are entirely automated,
relegating me a passive listener rather than an engaged user. Traditionally
designed with elderly (and presumably technophobic) customers in mind, the
emphasis for manufacturers has been on invisibility and ease of use, rather
than fine control. All the same, manufacturers take a dim view of users
fiddling with their own devices, and it’s very difficult for anyone who isn’t a
certified audiologist to get their hands on the specialist programming
equipment. Even the peripherals, such as additional microphones or Bluetooth
adaptors, tend to come locked down in proprietary formats.
These
restrictions raise an important question: exactly who owns my hearing?
In the
UK, any medical device implanted into the body becomes the property of that
person, and even if it is subsequently removed it remains part of their estate.
(Yes, in Britain you could, in theory, inherit your grandmother’s hip
replacement). However this rule doesn’t include prosthetic devices offered by
the National Health Service such as false limbs, which like crutches or a
wheelchair must be returned if the patient no longer needs them.
Things
are a little more complicated in the US, where the ownership of medical
implants is likely to be governed by a patient’s contract with their insurer.
But as a 2007 article in the Journal of Medical Ethics suggested,ownership does not
necessarily mean sovereignty, stating “by consenting to having an implantable device placed, the
patient is indirectly giving up the right to autonomous control of the device.”
Technically, my hearing aids are only on loan from the NHS. But these devices are a part of me, an extension of myself. So should health services – or even manufacturers – be allowed to control the abilities of devices that become part of a person’s body? In becoming a cyborg, my body has become the locus of three different parties, each of whom have different priorities over how my cybernetic hearing should function. A combination of personal, health and business interests all go into a shaping something that will become part of me.
Technically, my hearing aids are only on loan from the NHS. But these devices are a part of me, an extension of myself. So should health services – or even manufacturers – be allowed to control the abilities of devices that become part of a person’s body? In becoming a cyborg, my body has become the locus of three different parties, each of whom have different priorities over how my cybernetic hearing should function. A combination of personal, health and business interests all go into a shaping something that will become part of me.
Similar
restrictions will apply to those hoping to use other augmentations and
technological implants in the future. We can expect serious legal, societal and, should there
be a limit placed on how strong a bionic arm is? Should someone with retinal
implants be allowed to record the people they meet? Is it okay for someone
boosting their brainpower with magnetic pulses to beat other candidates in an
exam or job interview?
The
answers are unclear so far, but what’s more certain is that humans will
continually strive to enhance themselves and exploit technology to run faster,
see further or think sharper. I’m a cyborg, and soon you may be too – but don’t
assume the transformation will be smooth.
What does red or
green sound like?
Listen: In the clip below from BBC Radio 4’s Hack My Hearing, Frank
Swain meets an artist who created a unique device allowing him to hear colours.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada